porthole's setlist.fm

porthole's user profile image

About

Activity

Member since March 24, 2012
Last seen May 16, 2022
Edits so far 3765
Edits last month 53

Comments

Please sign in to comment.
You can also connect with Facebook or Twitter.

There might be more groups who have a song called No Expectations, so instead of the wikipedia link where there is no reference to Six By Seven https://www.setlist.fm/setlist/six-by-seven/1998/la-rotonde-sint-joost-ten-noode-saint-josse-ten-noode-belgium-13cf39c5.html#sfmsesg5bca7b3c use a link in future where it is clear Six By Seven covered that song e.g.
https://musicbrainz.org/release/7ead1c7c-f550-44c0-ab0c-7ce14f223c4e
https://musicbrainz.org/release/b2f34457-74dd-4a25-9d14-7cad48f3a4df

I have the actual hand written set list of this show (I booked the tour that this show was part of) and it is listed by the band themselves as I Wanna Kill (I know the recorded version says I want to Kill).

Hello

When asking about the Ben Folds improvisations on the setlist page, it's possible this may never be seen by the person who mentioned these. Comments are only seen if you choose the option to be warned if something has changed on the setlist. So it may be better to contact the person through his profile page.
Thanks for trying to modify these and other setlists.

Capitalisation can mean anything for a new user. So it's better to use *the reason* why you changed it.
I didn't say your edit was wrong, I just told you a valid source, which you promised to use.
If you come across such mistakes which take you a lot of time, you can tell any mod so he can perform a batch edit.
Thanks.

Quote. At the time of my edits, "Not the Same" had 568 entries on the site, while "Not The Same" had 14. So I changed the 14 to match the 568, combining them to make a total of 582 entries for that song. Are you suggesting that I should not have done this??

6 hours ago source Capitalisation which can be interpreted any way one wishes to do = https://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Style/Language/English

No worries if you follow up your promise.
I apologise for not providing enough information in my recent edit(s). I enjoy contributing to this website and I certainly don't mean to get the process wrong or attempt to "bypass" the comment box. I was under the mistaken impression that this box was basically an idiot test to make sure that people knew what they were doing and the edits were transparent; I didn't realise I had to provide a detailed source each time I changed anything. I'm frustrated that I had to be reprimanded for this as I only seek to be one of the good guys on this site. I'll ensure that I give more information in future.

Corrected cover song info is not a valid source, just a statement.
https://www.setlist.fm/setlist/jason-falkner/2009/shibuya-o-west-tokyo-japan-23d4ecef.html#sfmsesg1bc7e914
I noticed you mentioned just what you did on setlists to bypass the mandatory edit comment feature.
https://www.setlist.fm/guidelines#sources
"Be sure to explain why you edited the setlist. Don't explain what you've edited as this is obvious to the viewer."
Setlist.fm is a wiki-effort, and it is important for us all to be as transparent and clear as possible in sharing information. To ensure that edits are verified for other users, and to avoid unnecessary discussions and save a lot of time in the future, edit comments have been made mandatory for all users.
https://www.setlist.fm/guidelines#sources
Please ensure that you share informative comment with future edits, so that everybody understands where you received the information you're contributing.
Thanks!

User charts